1986 BMW 320 vs. 1990 Mazda 626
To start off, 1990 Mazda 626 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 BMW 320 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 BMW 320 | 1990 Mazda 626 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 320 | 626 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1990 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |