1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Acura CL

To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 370 kg more than 2002 Acura CL.

Because 1986 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Cadillac Brougham 2002 Acura CL
Make Cadillac Acura
Model Brougham CL
Year Released 1986 2002
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5030 cc 3210 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 0 HP 260 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1950 kg 1580 kg
Vehicle Length 5630 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 3090 mm 2580 mm