1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1999 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 1999 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Cimarron | Tracker |
Year Released | 1986 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2210 mm |