1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 445 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Laser | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | Laser | CL |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2580 mm |