1986 Dodge Charger vs. 2002 Acura CL

To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 530 kg more than 1986 Dodge Charger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Dodge Charger.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Dodge Charger 2002 Acura CL
Make Dodge Acura
Model Charger CL
Year Released 1986 2002
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1592 cc 3210 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 62 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6900 RPM
Torque 117 Nm 315 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 1580 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2580 mm