1986 Ford Sierra vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 268 more horse power than 1986 Ford Sierra. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Sierra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Sierra. (143 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Sierra | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Sierra | UTE |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 143 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |