1986 Isuzu Piazza vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Isuzu Piazza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Isuzu Piazza would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Clio (171 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1986 Isuzu Piazza. (148 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1986 Isuzu Piazza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Isuzu Piazza weights approximately 229 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Isuzu Piazza (226 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Renault Clio. (200 Nm @ 5400 RPM). This means 1986 Isuzu Piazza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Isuzu Piazza | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Isuzu | Renault |
Model | Piazza | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |