1986 Lancia ECV vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lancia ECV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lancia ECV would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lancia ECV (600 HP) has 492 more horse power than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda BT-50.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Lancia ECV | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | ECV | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1757 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |