1987 Holden Camira vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Holden Camira (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1987 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Holden Camira (176 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1987 Holden Camira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Holden Camira | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Camira | 2 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2500 mm |