1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V vs. 2005 Audi TT
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V would be higher.
Because 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V | 2005 Audi TT | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
Model | HSR-V | TT |
Year Released | 1987 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |