1987 Pontiac Firebird vs. 2012 Mazda 5

To start off, 2012 Mazda 5 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 2,825 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 5 (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1987 Pontiac Firebird. (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1987 Pontiac Firebird.

Because 1987 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Pontiac Firebird (230 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 5. (191 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1987 Pontiac Firebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 5.

Compare all specifications:

1987 Pontiac Firebird 2012 Mazda 5
Make Pontiac Mazda
Model Firebird 5
Year Released 1987 2012
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2825 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 133 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 230 Nm 191 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 4585 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1615 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2751 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 60 L