1988 Buick Skylark vs. 2002 Acura CL

To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1988 Buick Skylark. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1988 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 390 kg more than 1988 Buick Skylark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Buick Skylark. (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Buick Skylark.

Compare all specifications:

1988 Buick Skylark 2002 Acura CL
Make Buick Acura
Model Skylark CL
Year Released 1988 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 3210 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6900 RPM
Torque 217 Nm 315 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1190 kg 1580 kg
Vehicle Length 4580 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2580 mm