1988 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (216 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1988 Ford Falcon. (161 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford Falcon weights approximately 310 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1988 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Falcon (311 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 6. (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1988 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Falcon | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | 6 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3949 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2680 mm |