1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (134 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1964 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MG |
| Model | Camaro | 1100 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |
