1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1967 AC Cobra
To start off, 1989 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 395 kg more than 1967 AC Cobra.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Jeep Wrangler | 1967 AC Cobra | |
| Make | Jeep | AC |
| Model | Wrangler | Cobra |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1967 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 6997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 410 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1147 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 68 L |
