1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1989 Lotus Carlton is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Lotus Carlton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Lotus Carlton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 467 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Lotus Carlton | 1984 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Carlton | Colt |
Year Released | 1989 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3615 cc | 1437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 569 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2390 mm |