1989 Mercury Sable vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 460 kg more than 1989 Mercury Sable.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Mercury Sable | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mercury | Jeep |
Model | Sable | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1989 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2946 mm |