1989 Mercury Sable vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-V weights approximately 201 kg more than 1989 Mercury Sable.
Because 2013 Honda CR-V is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Mercury Sable | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mercury | Honda |
Model | Sable | CR-V |
Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1601 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |