1989 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Toyota Lite Ace | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Lite Ace | Ka |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1297 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1390 mm |