1990 BMW 316 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1990 BMW 316 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW 316 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 BMW 316 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW 316 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 316 | 850 K |
Year Released | 1990 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |