1990 BMW 316 vs. 1994 Chrysler Aviat

To start off, 1994 Chrysler Aviat is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW 316 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1994 Chrysler Aviat (145 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1990 BMW 316. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Aviat should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW 316.

Because 1990 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Aviat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Chrysler Aviat has automatic transmission and 1990 BMW 316 has manual transmission. 1990 BMW 316 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Chrysler Aviat will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1990 BMW 316 1994 Chrysler Aviat
Make BMW Chrysler
Model 316 Aviat
Year Released 1990 1994
Engine Position Front Front
Horse Power 100 HP 145 HP
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]