1990 BMW 316 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1990 BMW 316. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 128 kg more than 1990 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW 316. (141 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW 316. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1990 BMW 316 has manual transmission. 1990 BMW 316 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW 316 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 316 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3260 mm |
