1990 Citroen CX vs. 2004 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XJ is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Citroen CX would be higher. At 4,193 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 298 more horse power than 1990 Citroen CX. (102 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1990 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 459 kg more than 1990 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (553 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Citroen CX. 2004 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1990 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1990 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Citroen CX | 2004 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | CX | XJ |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 4193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 553 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1689 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 85 L |