1990 Fiat Uno vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1990 Fiat Uno is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1990 Fiat Uno. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1990 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1990 Fiat Uno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Fiat Uno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Fiat Uno | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Uno | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2880 mm |
