1990 Holden Apollo vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Holden Apollo would be higher.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Holden Apollo | 2006 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Apollo | C |
Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |