1990 Opel Omega vs. 2002 Acura CL

To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 1990 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 1990 Opel Omega has manual transmission. 1990 Opel Omega will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Opel Omega 2002 Acura CL
Make Opel Acura
Model Omega CL
Year Released 1990 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2410 cc 3210 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 0 HP 260 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2580 mm