1990 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Toyota Lite Ace | 2012 Audi A3 | |
Make | Toyota | Audi |
Model | Lite Ace | A3 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |