1991 Audi 80 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 80 weights approximately 104 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 80 (182 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (176 Nm). This means 1991 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | 80 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1991 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |