1991 Audi S2 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1991 Audi S2 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 455 kg more than 1991 Audi S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | S2 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 40 L |
