1991 Audi S2 vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 146 kg more than 1991 Audi S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Mustang (379 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi S2. (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi S2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | S2 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 379 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1566 kg |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 61 L |
