1991 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Le Baron | Range Rover Sport |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4783 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1933 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2743 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 88 L |
