1991 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Renault P55

To start off, 2000 Renault P55 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault P55 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1991 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55 should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault P55 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1991 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1991 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault P55 (260 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm). This means 2000 Renault P55 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications: