1991 Holden Apollo vs. 2000 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2000 Nissan Almera is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Almera. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Almera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Almera weights approximately 275 kg more than 1991 Holden Apollo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Nissan Almera (244 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Holden Apollo | 2000 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Apollo | Almera |
Year Released | 1991 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |