1992 Alpina B6 vs. 2005 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2005 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 605 more horse power than 1992 Alpina B6. (238 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1992 Alpina B6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Alpina B6 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2005 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 697 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Alpina B6. (293 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2005 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Alpina B6.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alpina B6 | 2005 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Alpina | Lotec |
Model | B6 | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2752 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 293 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |