1992 BMW 538 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 538. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 538 would be higher. At 3,795 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 538 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 538 (341 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Ram. (215 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 538 should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 100 kg more than 1992 BMW 538.
Because 1992 BMW 538 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 538. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 538 (400 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Ram. (319 Nm). This means 1992 BMW 538 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW 538 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | 538 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3795 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 341 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1900 mm |
