1992 Caterham Super 7 vs. 1989 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1992 Caterham Super 7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Caterham Super 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Caterham Super 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Caterham Super 7 | 1989 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Caterham | Chrysler |
Model | Super 7 | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1992 | 1989 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2560 mm |