1992 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 4,291 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 265 kg more than 1949 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Volvo PV 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chevrolet Astro | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Astro | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 4291 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2850 mm |
