1992 Dodge Caravan vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Caravan would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1992 Dodge Caravan. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1992 Dodge Caravan.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Dodge Caravan. (183 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Dodge Caravan.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Dodge Caravan | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Caravan | Tundra |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3270 mm |