1992 Ford Falcon vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1997 Honda CR-V is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Falcon (198 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1997 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1997 Honda CR-V.
Because 1992 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (348 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Falcon | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Falcon | CR-V |
Year Released | 1992 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 348 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2620 mm |