1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1980 Lada S
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lada S would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 205 kg more than 1980 Lada S.
Because 1980 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 1980 Lada S | |
Make | Holden | Lada |
Model | Apollo | S |
Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2470 mm |