1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 89 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Apollo | 6 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1294 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2730 mm |