1992 Honda CRX vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Honda CRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Honda CRX would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (222 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1992 Honda CRX. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1992 Honda CRX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1561 kg more than 1992 Honda CRX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford E-Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford E-Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Honda CRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Honda CRX. (141 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Honda CRX. 2013 Ford E-Series has automatic transmission and 1992 Honda CRX has manual transmission. 1992 Honda CRX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford E-Series will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Honda CRX | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Honda | Ford |
| Model | CRX | E-Series |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 387 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.38:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 2611 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 2085 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 150 L |
