1992 Renault Clio vs. 2005 Saturn L
To start off, 2005 Saturn L is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saturn L (182 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1992 Renault Clio. (48 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saturn L weights approximately 658 kg more than 1992 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saturn L (258 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Clio. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Renault Clio | 2005 Saturn L | |
| Make | Renault | Saturn |
| Model | Clio | L |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 1107 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 48 HP | 182 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1468 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
