1992 Toyota Corolla vs. 1980 Mazda 626
To start off, 1992 Toyota Corolla is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 626 would be higher. Both 1992 Toyota Corolla and 1980 Mazda 626 are equipped with a 1,586 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 626 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1992 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1980 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 1992 Toyota Corolla has manual transmission. 1992 Toyota Corolla will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Toyota Corolla | 1980 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Toyota | Mazda |
Model | Corolla | 626 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2520 mm |