1993 Acura Integra vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Acura Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1993 Acura Integra has manual transmission. 1993 Acura Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Acura Integra | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Acura | Jeep |
Model | Integra | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1993 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2916 mm |