1993 Alpina B6 vs. 2000 BMW Z9
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1993 Alpina B6. (238 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1993 Alpina B6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Alpina B6. (293 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Alpina B6.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Alpina B6 | 2000 BMW Z9 | |
Make | Alpina | BMW |
Model | B6 | Z9 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2752 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 293 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3110 mm |