1993 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2008 Ford E-250
To start off, 2008 Ford E-250 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 473 kg more than 2008 Ford E-250.
Because 2008 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler Concorde | 2008 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Concorde | E-250 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3499 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1107 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3510 mm |