1993 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler ES | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | ES | C70 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |