1993 Ford Royale vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Royale would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1993 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Royale.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Ford Royale. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1993 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Ford Royale | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Royale | Matrix |
Year Released | 1993 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |