1993 Holden Commodore vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1993 Holden Commodore. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1993 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 575 kg more than 1993 Holden Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Tundra (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Holden Commodore. (295 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
|1993 Holden Commodore||2000 Toyota Tundra|
|Engine Size||3791 cc||4663 cc|
|Engine Cylinders||6 cylinders||8 cylinders|
|Horse Power||173 HP||242 HP|
|Engine RPM||4800 RPM||4800 RPM|
|Torque||295 Nm||426 Nm|
|Torque RPM||3200 RPM||3400 RPM|
|Vehicle Weight||1375 kg||1950 kg|
|Vehicle Length||4870 mm||5530 mm|
|Vehicle Width||1800 mm||1920 mm|
|Vehicle Height||1450 mm||1800 mm|
|Wheelbase Size||2740 mm||3270 mm|